Tuesday, March 25, 2008
ARIZONA TWO STEP
Print all
Goldwater Institute: Policing for Profit and Political Gain
Inbox X
Send to a Friend
The Goldwater Institute Daily
March 5, 2008
Policing for Profit and Political Gain
RICO laws shouldn't provide incentive to plunder
By Tim Keller
Arizona's racketeering or "RICO" laws generate millions of dollars each year for local police and prosecutors by allowing their offices to seize and keep money and property allegedly used in or generated by criminal activity. The RICO laws require prosecutors to meet only the most minuscule of legal burdens in court before being allowed to pocket the proceeds.
At one time plunder was buried, today it is used to buy political ads.Impartiality is central to the constitutional guarantee of due process. Giving law enforcement agencies a direct financial stake in the outcome of forfeiture proceedings makes them anything but impartial. Justice is best served when law enforcement professionals pursue criminals, not property and profit.
Here in Maricopa County, we've seen instances where public attorneys have used RICO money on slick brochures that prominently featured their names. And the Maricopa County Sheriff's office recently engaged in a bitter fight with the Pima County Attorney's office over who would prosecute a forfeiture case involving $30 million seized from an allegedly illegal gambling operation. The dispute arose because the prosecuting agency would pocket the money.
Representative Kyrsten Sinema has introduced HB 2547 to prohibit forfeiture funds from being "used for advertisements featuring the name or likeness of any public official." This is a good idea, but here's a better idea: Eliminate prosecutors' profit incentives by requiring that forfeited funds be deposited in a general fund subject to the appropriations process rather than in slush funds controlled by the seizing agency.
Tim Keller is the executive director of the Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter and the co-author of Policing and Prosecuting for Profit: Arizona's Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws Violate Basic Due Process Protections, a 2004 Goldwater Institute Policy Report.
Learn More
Goldwater Institute: Policing and Prosecuting for Profit: Arizona's Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws Violate Basic Due Process Protections
Arizona Republic: Sheriff's Office fought for case
Arizona House of Representatives: HB 2547
Contact
Tim Keller
Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter
tkeller@ij.org
Goldwater logo
Forward email
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to supergramps.duane@gmail.com, by pgibbons@goldwaterinstitute.org
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy.
Goldwater Institute | 500 E. Coronado Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone (602) 462-5000 | Fax (602) 256-7045 | Email info@goldwaterinstitute.org
Reply
Forward
Goldwater Institute: Policing for Profit and Political Gain
Inbox X
Send to a Friend
The Goldwater Institute Daily
March 5, 2008
Policing for Profit and Political Gain
RICO laws shouldn't provide incentive to plunder
By Tim Keller
Arizona's racketeering or "RICO" laws generate millions of dollars each year for local police and prosecutors by allowing their offices to seize and keep money and property allegedly used in or generated by criminal activity. The RICO laws require prosecutors to meet only the most minuscule of legal burdens in court before being allowed to pocket the proceeds.
At one time plunder was buried, today it is used to buy political ads.Impartiality is central to the constitutional guarantee of due process. Giving law enforcement agencies a direct financial stake in the outcome of forfeiture proceedings makes them anything but impartial. Justice is best served when law enforcement professionals pursue criminals, not property and profit.
Here in Maricopa County, we've seen instances where public attorneys have used RICO money on slick brochures that prominently featured their names. And the Maricopa County Sheriff's office recently engaged in a bitter fight with the Pima County Attorney's office over who would prosecute a forfeiture case involving $30 million seized from an allegedly illegal gambling operation. The dispute arose because the prosecuting agency would pocket the money.
Representative Kyrsten Sinema has introduced HB 2547 to prohibit forfeiture funds from being "used for advertisements featuring the name or likeness of any public official." This is a good idea, but here's a better idea: Eliminate prosecutors' profit incentives by requiring that forfeited funds be deposited in a general fund subject to the appropriations process rather than in slush funds controlled by the seizing agency.
Tim Keller is the executive director of the Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter and the co-author of Policing and Prosecuting for Profit: Arizona's Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws Violate Basic Due Process Protections, a 2004 Goldwater Institute Policy Report.
Learn More
Goldwater Institute: Policing and Prosecuting for Profit: Arizona's Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws Violate Basic Due Process Protections
Arizona Republic: Sheriff's Office fought for case
Arizona House of Representatives: HB 2547
Contact
Tim Keller
Institute for Justice Arizona Chapter
tkeller@ij.org
Goldwater logo
Forward email
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to supergramps.duane@gmail.com, by pgibbons@goldwaterinstitute.org
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy.
Goldwater Institute | 500 E. Coronado Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone (602) 462-5000 | Fax (602) 256-7045 | Email info@goldwaterinstitute.org
Reply
Forward
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



No comments:
Post a Comment